Lennox Saint
Open menu

BuilderBenchby the LAB

24 September 2026 · v1 pilot · pack 1.0.0
4-hour build window · Extra High (xhigh) · Standard

the reveal · one owner-scored pilot

Opus 5.5 scored 68.26. GPT-6 Sol scored 45.55.

One owner-scored pilot of each model, harness and tool setup. This is not a universal model ranking or a statistical claim.

final scores out of 100

Claude harnessleads this assessment

Opus 5.5

68.26/100

quality 70% of the score
61.80
autonomy 20%
80
proactivity 10%
90
US$49.67

API estimate in US dollars · see coverage below
API equivalent · not a bill

Codex harnessfinal score

GPT-6 Sol

45.55/100

quality 70% of the score
46.50
autonomy 20%
40
proactivity 10%
50
US$12.75

API estimate in US dollars · see coverage below
API equivalent · not a bill

Opus 5.5 leads by 22.71 points.

one owner-scored pilot. one run per setup. a lead in one assessment is not a ranking. the limits are below.

how each score is built

quality is the weighted average of the task scores. autonomy is how little owner rescue the setup needed. proactivity is useful initiative inside the brief. each is scored out of 100.

the final score is quality × 70% + autonomy × 20% + proactivity × 10%. cost never buys points.

  • Opus 5.5: 43.26 + 16.00 + 9.00 = 68.26
  • GPT-6 Sol: 32.55 + 8.00 + 5.00 = 45.55

dated references

every cleared score, by date. not a leaderboard.

each bar is one owner review of one run. the packs, tasks and evidence limits differ, and each bar says which pack and which kind of review it was. scores only compare inside one pack.

  1. Opus 5.524 Sep 2026 · v1 · pack 1.0.0 · with Claude
    one owner-scored pilot · this result
    68.26
  2. GPT-6 Sol24 Sep 2026 · v1 · pack 1.0.0 · with Codex
    one owner-scored pilot · this result
    45.55
  3. Gemini 4 Argon14 Oct 2026 · v3 · pack 3.0.0 · with BuilderBench API harness
    owner-finalized partial personal review
    45.38
  4. Muse Wonder Full14 Oct 2026 · v3 · pack 3.0.0 · with Muse Code
    owner-finalized partial personal review
    39.91
  5. GPT-6 Luna8 Oct 2026 · v3 · pack 3.0.0 · with Codex
    owner-finalized partial personal assessment
    44.58
  6. Haiku 5.58 Oct 2026 · v3 · pack 3.0.0 · with Claude
    owner-finalized partial personal assessment
    39.18
  7. GPT-6.1 Sol30 Sep 2026 · v3 · pack 3.0.0 · with Codex
    owner-finalized partial personal assessment
    41.75
  8. Sonnet 5.529 Sep 2026 · v3 · pack 3.0.0 · with Claude
    owner-finalized partial personal assessment
    48.98
  9. GPT-6 Astra26 Sep 2026 · v2 · pack 2.0.0 · with Codex
    personal assessment with accepted recording limitations
    53.75

task breakdown

where each setup gained and lost ground

each task is scored out of 100. its weight is its share of the quality score.

Task scores out of 100 for each setup, with each task’s share of the quality score
taskOpus 5.5score /100GPT-6 Solscore /100
01 · Writing20% of quality4930
02 · Video editing15% of quality4010
03 · Frontend design15% of quality6040
04 · Motion graphics10% of quality6030
05 · Browser & computer15% of quality7090
06 · Research & decisions10% of quality7055
07 · Intake automation10% of quality9590
08 · Founder conversation5% of quality8040

API pricing

rates, the run estimate and the bill are three different things.

the rates are what the provider listed on the date shown. the estimate prices the usage this run recorded. the bill is what was actually charged. they are kept apart on purpose.

Opus 5.5

official API rates

no rate card was frozen with this result.this result was published before rate cards were required. its recorded estimate keeps the price basis it had on the day. no newer price has been applied to it.

recorded estimate for this run
US$49.67Provider-reported API estimates for the recorded task rows.
actual bill
unknown. billing for this run: existing subscriptions. no receipted charge exists for it, and unknown is not zero.

GPT-6 Sol

official API rates

no rate card was frozen with this result.this result was published before rate cards were required. its recorded estimate keeps the price basis it had on the day. no newer price has been applied to it.

recorded estimate for this run
US$12.75Partial recorded usage only; unknown attempts and shared overhead are excluded.
actual bill
unknown. billing for this run: existing subscriptions. no receipted charge exists for it, and unknown is not zero.

API-equivalent estimates are not bills. Actual incremental spend is unknown. The methods and coverage differ, so these figures do not support an exact cost ratio.

correction

the correction is a receipt

2026-09-24 15:13 UTC · fixed before this result went public

what happened: after the scores were locked, live-chat deliverables were still flagged as missing.

why: stale missing-file flags from the offline window. the frozen files and their hashes were checked again, and they were there.

what did not change: my ratings of the work did not change. only the missing-file flags did.

Scores before and after the correction
setupscorebeforeafter
Opus 5.5 · Claudequality57.8061.80
Opus 5.5 · Claudeoverall65.4668.26
GPT-6 Sol · Codexquality44.5046.50
GPT-6 Sol · Codexoverall44.1545.55

review conditions

how this run was reviewed

The owner scored quality, autonomy and proactivity after a blind review. Quality is the weighted score across eight task families. The score lock happened before identities were revealed.

scores locked
yes
names revealed
yes, after lock

frozen setup

what was tested

pack version
1.0.0
build window
4 hours
reasoning
Extra High (xhigh)
speed
Standard
billing
Existing subscriptions
owner scores
1 per setup

exact model and harness version strings are not in this public export, so they stay unknown here.

limits

what this result does not prove

  • This was one pilot scored by one owner, not a universal ranking.
  • The score belongs to each full setup: model, harness, tools and settings.
  • The two cost estimates use different methods and coverage.
  • Actual incremental spend remains unknown because the run used existing subscriptions.
  • Complete normal-speed watched-and-listened review of both full video outputs was not established.
BuilderBench pilot result: Opus 5.5 scored 68.26 and GPT-6 Sol scored 45.55, with API-equivalent estimate caveats.
the result graphic. one owner-scored pilot. costs are estimates, not bills. every number in it is also on this page as text.

p.s.

get the next BuilderBench result first.

  • the exact prompt i typed
  • what came back
  • where it fell over

free. unsubscribe any time, one click. privacy.

  • 32,718 on Threads
  • 3,675 readers
  • 1.84K on YouTube

live count, 24 oct 2026.